![]() Melden Fred Associate, 1848 posts | Damn! Wonderful vision! The writing will have to improve greatly to match it, but the effort and time will be well worthwhile. Let’s begin w/S1: I think the even-numbered lines should be italicized, and they should be a unified rumination. (by the way, the indents did not translate to all the lines.) Taking those lines, they begin with your actions (feel / recall / muse) but end with “weave”. It seems to me that the “matriarchs and daughters” are the ones weaving the waves, and I thus suggest, “weaving waves through lifetimes”. “Partition” sounds unpoetic, but to make it work in the 3rd line, substitutes like “part” or “divide” don’t work. You might consider “bundling” I really am not satisfied with that either, but I can’t think of a really good word right now. I believe on L1, it should be “fine-spun”. You might consider changing L5 & & to simply “left over middle” “right over middle”. In the end, you could have the even-numbered lines – the reflective ones – be longer, more thoroughly worded, and the odd-numbered ones short, cursory. S2: Begin stronger by eliminating the “and”. Make it sound like a vision, a proclamation: “I am the storyteller / who tells of all the shes... / the shee who...(etc)”. L7: Don’t get trapped by you own form. It’s not necessary to continue throughout with the “she” beginnings: “the child she orphaned at birth”. L12: I suggest “firmer” for a couple of reasons – rhythm and comparative w/previous line. L13: Again, “the lonely she who echoed forth”. I would also eliminate the “and” at the end of the line. S3: I get all choked up here. A sign of modernity’s loss is that tears do not stain web pages as they do paper. L3-4. I think the “the” should begin L4. I’m curious why you chose “coarse of grey” rather than merely “coarse, grey”. I hope you don’t consider this logorrhea excessive, and I hope it’s been of help. I’m saving this on my computer to compare with after your edit. Really, really nice. Alcuin |
![]() Leanne Hansonfrom Just west of the lounge room Associate, 3708 posts | Julie, I am not in the right headspace to properly critique this now but I wanted to let you know that it's outstanding -- you're right, it's not perfected yet, but it will be, and it will be great. The concept is brilliant. I will come back, I promise. |
![]() Rice Janelle 35 posts |
Breathtaking! It brought tears to my eyes--which says to me, you have a beautiful piece here, even before you do all the fine tuning.
One part that confused me though, and I had to re-read was: "i comb your fine spun hair feel my mother brushing mine partition into threes recall her mother’s partitioning"
I hear "you" speaking, but then who is "her"-who is recalling her mother? Is it you? Recalling your own mother braiding your hair as you are braiding your daughters? I agree that partition doesn't fit quite right there... and not so much twice in one stanza. I will have to ponder that and see if I can think of another word that may work...
Beautiful, though! I love it and look forward to watching it develop! |
![]() Julie herselffrom Here and There 302 posts | Thank you so much for all the thoughtful, touching comments. The partitioning IS a challenge. I thesaurused it, thought on it, and still didn't come up with anything better. I hoped it would work because we seperate the braids, 'part' hair, and there's a double meaning of my grandmother's partitioning - which isn't really important to the poem, but just is. Hopefully the right word will pop up from the ethers . . . I would love to find a way to make the lines or stanza's weave a bit, or have the effect of a braid . . . but couldn't sort that out either!!!
|
![]() Stephan Ansteyfrom Lowell, MA Associate, 6232 posts |
Hey, if you want a visual effect of braids, you could try something like:
Where you do three words, a few spaces (5-10), a word, then same number of spaces, then 3 words, and next line 2, 2, 2 -- next line 1, 3, 1, and so forth. It'd offer a visual simulation of a braid and still be a very loose form to work with. (you might also center it when you're done, that'd probably help the effect alone)
|
![]() Julie herselffrom Here and There 302 posts |
Oh wow! I'll try that out! |
![]() Leanne Hansonfrom Just west of the lounge room Associate, 3708 posts | Have you thought of "parting" instead of "partitioning"? |
![]() Julie herselffrom Here and There 302 posts | Everytime I go to work on this piece, nothing better seems to come. Even in the midst of a creative phase! How absolutely frustrating . . . And thanks, Leanne, parting is better. Amazing how the answer can be so simple, in fact, it usually is. |