
I like the style of writing. It's economic and concise, using salient ingredients
to convey image and meaning; and it is lucid which allows the poem to communicate vividly.
The darkness of the blind plays with that wider light and dark of daylight and night; and the
piece hints at other aspects of darkness. It presents a paradox where the darkness of the blind
is associated with light. There's a humanity at the heart of this which appeals. Rgds.,Alan.

Truthfully, I did not care for this at first. The writing is concise, but the exposition seemed to accomplish little. I did not feel at the end that I knew / understood / experienced any more than when I started. Further, there is nothing in the words to take my heart away - to affect me emotionally in a direct, verbal way. The sounds of the words do little.
But viewed as a vignette of life, this is quite effective. When I look at this less as an experience of poetry and more as a description of life-experience, I began to appreciate it. Remembering some of your other poems and how they struck me, I realize you do a lot of "vignetting" and very little "versifying", a big difference between us. From now on, in looking over your writing, I'll keep that in mind.
You get a lot of imagery out of a few words, and your words are well chosen, such as "predicting" in L2. Also, it was wise to put "crossing in front of me" in the last strophe. That made it real and personal; and experience instead of a disembodied fact. One little nit: You end the 1st lines of S2 & S5 with periods. You might do better with commas there. Otherwise, very nice!
Alcuin