
Dude, you're going to make me read this like a hundred times to figure it out, aren't you?
The first stanza, i thought maybe you were going in a really nonsensical direction, but you aren't at all. I think that first stanza is tight and actually did lead me where i needed to be to suddenly flip over into the second and third. The broken agreement in the verbs seemed slightly reminiscent of early 19th century slave-grammar, almost Twain like, and I found it to be very powerful and evocative of the old Chicago jazz you're so clearly pointing towards throughout.
The rhythm of this also held me firm and referred back to the offbeat of good jazz, whilst holding on to a poetic lyric that flowed well upon reading aloud.
Now, as far as meaning, I think i might need some help, and further readings.
- stephan

See, I didn't read this as a Kerouac poem at all. Yes, he's referred to, but I didn't see this as much an homage to Kerouac as an echo of Beat in general... and perhaps more straight Jazz. In that sense he's not out of his depth at all. But certainly there's no Maggie Cassady in here.

- stephan