Skip to main content Help Control Panel

Shakespeare's Monkeys

Infinite Monkeys. Infinite Typewriters.

More in Poetry and other writes of Alcuin of York

An Open Letter to Right Wingers

Response to reactions to Leanne's write

I find incredible the repetition of the blindness and irrationality that is currently manifesting itself in this country. To you who say that foreigners should not criticize the US because they don't understand, let me ask if you think you shouldn't comment or criticize other nations. After all, that would follow logically. People in most other nations above the third world know more about us than most American know about them. Heck, most Americans can't even locate another country on a map, and some can't even find the continents.

I would remind you of the words in the Declaration of Independence: "...a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires..." It was one of Jefferson's (and other founding fathers) reasons for writing the document. Perhaps you don't think you can learn from them something about proper American values, but I disagree. The opinions of foreign nations were important to them. Today, with our growing dependence on foreign nations for our materiel, energy, money and brainpower, we must be even more sensitive to the opinions of mankind. I might also remind you that the person whose writing rights you criticized is a citizen of one of the "Coalition of the Willing". That gives her the right to criticize her government's actions, and by extension, its allies.

When I said at the beginning "repetition of the blindness and irrationality", I was referring to history. We wronged the American Indians, then later felt bad and said we wouldn't make that mistake again. We interred the Japanese-Americans in WWII, and later said we wouldn't do that again. We gave way to hysteria and meanness during the McCarthy era, then said it was a mistake and we wouldn't do it again. We yelled and screamed about dominoes during the Vietnam War; today we trade with them and say we won't do that again. And now we're in Iraq, doing it again.

One of the other things our founding fathers said was that the greatest threat to liberty was war. Yes, they actually said it. It was the main reason behind Washington's (George, not the capitol) warning to avoid foreign entanglements. It was the reason most of the founding fathers wanted us to NOT have a large standing army. For several years of the new republic, we did not even possess a navy. One other thing they recognized is that democracy could not exist without certain preconditions. One was the condition of being informed about current events. This was necessary for the people to make good choices, and is the primary reason behind both the First Amendment and their push for universal education. Most Americans are ridiculously uninformed - more than half STILL believe WMD's were found in Iraq following our latest invasion; they are unaware that we put Saddam's party in power in the 1970's; and they have never read a book by Chalmers Johnson or any other writer (there are literally dozens) who reveal our sordid past. They still think we're number one in the world in things like education, health care, per-capita income, life expectancy, etc. In short, their worldview is frozen in the 1950's.

The other precondition for democracy is dissent. Where there is no dissent there is no democracy, but right-wingers tend to confuse dissent with disloyalty. Some think that dissent should not be aired during wartime. We found the German people guilty for remaining silent during wartime, and rightly so. To wait to speak up until after evil has already wreaked its damage is immoral.

The fact is that this country could withstand a 9/11 event every single year, and never fall. Our population grows annually by a hundred times the loss of life we endured on that day, and the economy grows by twenty times. But we cannot endure if our liberties are lost even once. They have been encroached upon by both Clinton and Bush to an extent that citizens of my parents' generation would not have tolerated for two seconds. But that was when Americans were braver, better educated, and more civic-minded. If I had to guess, I would give the American Empire less than 20 years before it - like most empires - wears itself out.

Alcuin of York

Comments

Derma Kaput - on Aug. 8 2007
I must of missed something.  People here are saying "foreigners" should not express an opinion about America?  Seems like I hear an awful lot of opinions being expressed by Americans about other countries.  I think anybody can say whatever they want about anything.  We're grown-ups, right?
Anstey - on Aug. 8 2007

now, look, i can take everything Alcuin said. (because basically he and I agree on most of that, and disagree on the facts, and I am actually saying much the same as he is though perhaps on a different war) Interestingly,I think most of what Alcuin wrote is equally applicable to the left as the right.

But I'm sorry Derma, i can not abide your suggestion that i am, or ever will be a grownup.

You go too far.

I am not now, nor ever will I be, a grownup.  You bastard.


-----
  • stephan

Derma Kaput - on Aug. 8 2007
Well, I'm anything but grown-up too.  all this brouhaha just surprised me.  I am a genuine bastard though.  we bastards take pride in that.
Anstey - on Aug. 8 2007

I really dont' see it as a brouhaha. I think everyone has been really polite, maybe a bit vigorous. I admire very much those who disagree with me who are respectful and polite -- even if they don't say m uch of anything, or post seperately. I think it's totally fine. There's no harrassment or anything like that. This really isn't a political site, but I don't think we should abandon a whole swatch of thought out of fear of confrontation or disturbance.

If it gets unruly, maybe we just all step back for a bit. But there's no real need to be mean or hateful. WHich by the way, Alcuin's post is thoughtful and nice. I don't agree with it, but I admire it.

So... my fellow bastard... yay! no grownups!  


-----
  • stephan

Leanne - on Aug. 8 2007

Really what it boils down to is, people need to be able to see that no politician, anywhere in the world, makes a single decision without an agenda.  No politician is altruistic.  Some of these decisions may benefit millions of people, but you can put your money on the fact that they will benefit one small group of people more than any other.  That flow-on is not a bad thing -- but while millions of people get a nice tan from that glorious radiation, someone somewhere is getting skin cancer. And for every action there is an equal and opposite reaction.   

Following 9/11, Australia and the UK were the very first nations to back the US in action against terrorist organisations.  (Our Prime Minister was actually in Washington DC the day of the bombing, so I'm sure you can guess how quickly he saw the necessity).  Nobody (significant) in this country or any other in the Coalition has ever suggested that we don't need to stop terrorist actions -- by EVERY country, including Ireland, please note how much funding the US has poured into the IRA.  By the time Bush decided to extend his war in the Middle East to Iraq, we were bound by treaty (long standing and ALWAYS honoured) to support him.  We were all well aware that this war was ill-defined and did not follow any kind of "traditional" rules -- but I very much doubt anyone in the world truly believes the war has been handled properly, and the agendas are becoming more and more transparent.  Meanwhile we turn a blind eye to the social injustices of Pakistan and Saudi Arabia because they're "good guys".  Africa and the South East Asian region are rife with dictatorial regimes and mass genocide -- on a MUCH greater scale than Hussein ever perpetrated.  Indonesia is a bloody mess, with the government actively trying to destroy the newly formed nation of East Timor and desperate to hold on to Aceh (where practising Christianity may be punished by death).   

The people of the Middle East have been fighting amongst each other for thousands of years. Borders shift with the sands.  It's our own modern tradition of keeping borders concrete that is buggering things up -- they'll sort it out.  People will die.  People will live.  Ease the path for people to leave and resettle in other countries -- immigration has got to be less expensive in dollars and lives than maintaining a pointless war that has invited Al Qaeda into a country it did not operate in before we stuck our noses in.

And for God's sake, accept that other nations ARE politically aware.  We're saturated with information about the US, and if it's doctored information I'm willing to bet it's no more biased than what you're getting in your own country.  Possibly less so.

But most importantly of all, learn to take a joke. 


Anstey - on Aug. 8 2007
We can we take jokes? Is there a place to turn in the ones that have gone bad?
-----
  • stephan

Magsie - on Aug. 11 2007

I agree with Ste in that this post has no business being addressed to the "right wing" group. In fact, the original Conservative movement is the closest link we have to the foundation of the country and the documents you quote with so much flair. They were the original radicals and the party that made it their sole effort to keep a government at bay and small.

Now, if you had addressed it to Neo-Conservatives or CowboyPresidents or something of the same ilk, I could rally behind that. Neo-Conservatism is the new Right Wing and Socialism is the new Left Wing, and nothing will bring this country to its knees faster because neither party is checking the boundaries of the government that causes the overthrow of everything true and worth going to war for or anything that we are cemented in.

Talk about shaking a foundation. Sigh.


Share
* Invite participants
* Share at Facebook
* Share at Twitter
* Share at LinkedIn
* Reference this page
Monitor
Recent files
Member Pages »
See also