Skip to main content Help Control Panel

Shakespeare's Monkeys

Infinite Monkeys. Infinite Typewriters.

More in Prose & Such

Searching for Something: On how I write poetry

I have this amazing friend, who I was talking to about poetry and such, and she was seemingly taken aback when I said, "I don't buy into the 'writing from the heart' or 'write what you feel' or any of that crap. I just decide what to write and write it. I have A LOT of poetry that I've written... most of it is absolutely awful. I can't be worried about that though. One must accept what happens and move on."


I thought at first, it was because she took that as a personal insult to her own work, but I think, maybe that wasn't it. It is as much an insult to anyone that reads what I write, and doesn't think it's crap, and feels inspired  or moved by it. It suggests that I"m being insincere and manipulative in everything I write and do.

And, as I've said to anyone who asks, It isn't as if anything I'm writing is some great masterpiece -- the English language will be fine without my tiny bit of turd on the grand pile of verbiage.

When I write, the meaning and sincerity are there, even if, during the act of writing, I do my level best to not let my emotionas control my pen. I realize that I am at odds with almost every poet I meet on these issues.

I write best when I separate myself from my feelings on things. I construct poems, and try to use craft and skill. One of the first things I do is try to remove the line i like most and rewrite the poems without it. Almost every poet I know, thinks I'm an idiot. BUT, it works for me. I don't tell anyone how to write poetry really. For just that reason.

To my way of thinking, poetry is just like any other writing. It's no different to write a poem than it is directions on how to tie shoelaces. The only difference is the effect. A poem typically works towards the emotional; the tools we use to write a poem are more effective in evoking feelings and emotions than say the language and tools one uses to describe putting together a bookcase.

When I start a poem, I decide its purpose and atmosphere first. That allows me to select the language, the rhythm, and the images more specifically relevant to the piece. It's really no different than how I might write an essay and the fact that feelings are set aside does not remove the meaning of the message.

I do not write for some sort of emotional catharsis. My writing gives me all the joy that any act of free will might, but the connection to an audience -- the moment when someone understands some something that is in my head, and understands me -- THAT is a reason to write.

What I 'feel' is irrelevant to writing process except perhaps as subject matter, but what I think what I learn, what I know, and how I'm able to communicate my feelings and thoughts through writing using poetic tools, or prose tools, or tech-writing tools; that's an amazing thing full of meaning.

Fully grasping what I want to say, finding some inner calm, and letting go of random stray emotion and feelings before I write, that does not mean that what I write was not ABOUT my feelings, it means I tried to set them aside while i wrote it. Writing for me is about communicating, it's not about making myself feel good. I'm not often trying to release some inner demons or work out my thoughts when I write. That is more what I do when I sit quietly by myself.

Regardless, the point is this: I'm not insulting you when I say I don't buy into the write-what-you-feel or 'write-from-the-heart' things. I am sure for many of you, that's exactly what you do, and it works for you.

To those I will inevitably insult whenever I talk about these things -- I suppose you can take this as a blanket pre-apology, and then I'll give you a personalized one after the fact.

Comments

Julie - on May 1 2007
At first, I felt myself getting defensive in response to this, but after reading on, I have to admit I relate for the most part. I think we "poet" and "artist" types, for the most part, get caught up in the emotion, which can act as an excellent springboard but does not alone make for substantial, quality work.

I've done my share of "writing from the heart" and "writing in the moment", but when I later took a step back and looked at it objectively, I've found that I rarely get it right the first time. So there's a lot of thought and "poengineering" that go on behind the scenes to build a finished piece that I'm willing to put my name on.

This is not to say I won't trust my instincts and write something a certain way because it "feels" right: there's a huge difference between emotion and sensing, and I'll trust my senses before my emotions any day.
Alcuin of York - on May 1 2007
No need to apologize – you write in the way that works for you, and the results certainly warrant respect for the frame of mind and approach that spawned them.
I don’t agree with you about “It isn’t as if [you’re] writing some great masterpiece”. It certainly is for me. No, this is neither joke nor megalomania. I don’t expect anyone to read my work a century from now, but I do write as if they are going to do so, and I want my work to be good enough to stand that test. If it doesn’t, it’s a disappointment. It is the target, the standard, the benchmark. That benchmark I believe has helped immensely to improve my writing.
Re shoelaces: If you think about it, much of the programming that makes it automatic is based on feeling.
I don’t believe in choosing a purpose at the beginning – at least not an unchanging purpose. As a former professor of English lit has stated it to me, “If I knew where a poem was going to end up, there wouldn’t be any point in writing it.” Writing is part discovery. Feelings shouldn’t command our writing, but I do try to use the writing to evoke emotions, to add an emotional dimension to the tonal, conceptual, and metrical aspects of the writing. When they all come together (IF they all come together), I feel pure joy.
Alcuin
Anstey - on May 1 2007
I think you raise a really good point there -- I do decide my purpose and point to start with, but it is NOT unchanging. Very often, if not most often, perhaps almost every single time, the exact purpose, the exact idea does change. I do think it's best to have some plan, some idea of what one intends, but on the other hand it is foolish to be so strict and stubborn to the original purpose and intent that one refuses to improve upon it.
-----
  • stephan

Share
* Invite participants
* Share at Facebook
* Share at Twitter
* Share at LinkedIn
* Reference this page
Monitor
Recent files
Member Pages »
See also