2- Kath
on Nov. 18 2007
The inflormation on relation between the literary mag and site is good, and as I thought, and has been explained. It makes sense.
The publishing part-- some publishers don't want to see work on the web no matter where. (Others don't care.) If it's "members only" it's fine.
(On Path I only have my most recent work available to view by anyone but members.) After it's a month old, I change it to "members only" so I can try to work on having it in print journals.
I need to post more here.
3- Julie
on Nov. 21 2007
4- Kath
on Nov. 21 2007
it IS interesting... so I agree, after publication, giving credit to where it has been published, and in public domain is perfect!
When I firstpostsomething I generally like my friends who are not poets or don't belong to the sites, to be able to read
but then I generally want to make it members only in the interim--
for more consideration, friendliness, etc...
my friend Don Campbell: his process:
1.post new poems for a month, public.
2. a)then take them down, put in chapbooks, publish etc.
b) simultaneously start the new month posting new ones
3. repeat every month
I find the variations on this fascinating. I really am not sure how I want to do it. But one thing is--I am so preoccupied with writing that I can't quite figure out the posting-publishing thing. I am always on fire with poetry itself.
----- please write back
1- Leanne
on Nov. 18 2007